President Donald Trump did not dodge the question. He owned it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
On Friday, October 23, Trump said he personally ordered the Justice Department to sue to block Alaska from certifying its November 3 Senate race result if Republican incumbent Senator Dan S. Sullivan loses narrowly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
"I'm the one that said, 'Do it,'" Trump said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
With that one sentence, a lawsuit that might have looked like routine Justice Department business became something else entirely: a presidential intervention, announced by the president himself, days before voters finish casting ballots.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Justice Department filed its lawsuit on October 22 in federal court in Alaska. Its argument centers on a second name on the ballot: Daniel J. Sullivan Jr., a retired schoolteacher from Petersburg.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The DOJ argues that having two men with nearly identical names on the ballot could confuse voters and siphon votes away from the incumbent senator \u2014 a split that, the lawsuit contends, would benefit Democratic challenger Mary Peltola.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The lawsuit asks the court to prevent certification of a result "that may be impacted by voter confusion" while an investigation is pending. It does not ask the court to declare a winner. And, crucially, it has not blocked anything yet. The election has not been decided, and no certification has been stopped.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This is not the first time Alaska has wrestled with the two Sullivans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Alaska elections director Carol Beecher determined on June 15 that Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. had not declared a good-faith candidacy but had filed "with a purpose to confuse or mislead" voters. State courts, however, reinstated him on the ballot, and the Alaska Supreme Court upheld that decision in June.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Sullivan Jr. himself denies he is a plant, and Democrats have rejected that claim as well. He is, by his own account, a retired teacher running for office \u2014 not a decoy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That history is why the federal lawsuit landed with such force. Alaska's own system already examined the question, and its courts already ruled. Now the Justice Department is asking a federal court to revisit it, days before the election.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Election-law experts are not hiding their surprise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Derek Muller, a professor at Notre Dame, called the legal argument "strange and unusual" in comments to CNN. The reasoning is unusual, he suggested, because federal lawsuits seeking to pre-emptively block certification over ballot confusion \u2014 before any votes are even counted \u2014 are extraordinarily rare.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The timing is what makes it explosive. A lawsuit filed ten days before an election, aimed at a race that could help decide control of the Senate, does not stay a dry legal filing for long. It becomes a political event.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Strip away the legal language and the stakes are simple. If Senator Sullivan wins, the lawsuit likely fades. If he loses narrowly, the Justice Department's filing gives the administration a ready-made legal path to challenge certification \u2014 and Trump has now publicly tied himself to it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Supporters of the lawsuit will say it is about protecting voters from confusion. Critics will say it is about pre-loading a challenge to an unfavorable result. Both sides agree on one thing: the president has now made this his fight, in his own words.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Alaska voters, meanwhile, head to the polls with a strange new reality. Their Senate race is no longer just a contest between an incumbent and a challenger. It is now a national story, with the president himself in the middle of it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Sources: Reuters, USA Today, AFP via AsiaOne (October 23, 2026).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Trump said he personally ordered the Justice Department lawsuit seeking to block certification of Alaska’s Senate race if Sen. Dan Sullivan loses narrowly.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":209,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-208","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/todayusa.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/todayusa.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/todayusa.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/todayusa.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/todayusa.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=208"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/todayusa.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":210,"href":"https:\/\/todayusa.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208\/revisions\/210"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/todayusa.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/209"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/todayusa.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=208"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/todayusa.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=208"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/todayusa.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}